The Journal Gazette
Friday, January 10, 2020 1:00 am

Environmental review targeted

Trump proposes major rollback of federal oversight

Associated Press

WASHINGTON – In a dramatic rollback of environmental oversight, President Donald Trump took action Thursday to clear the way and speed up development of a wide range of commercial projects by cutting back federal review of their impact on the environment.

“The United States can't compete and prosper if a bureaucratic system holds us back from building what we need,” Trump said at the White House in announcing the proposed regulatory rollback, surrounded by Cabinet secretaries, industry leaders and workers in hard hats.

Trump's proposal calls for greatly narrowing the scope of the half-century-old National Environmental Policy Act, signed by Republican President Richard Nixon in 1970. It was one of the first of that era's fundamental environmental laws, along with the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, that spelled out the country's principal protections.

That National Environmental Policy Act required federal agencies to consider whether a project would harm the air, land, water or wildlife. It also gave the public, including people living in the neighborhood around a proposed dam, pipeline or other big project, the right of review and input. Congress said at the time that the nation was moving to “fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations.”

Trump, who has targeted environmental rules in his drive to ease the way for business, said Thursday that enforcement had slowed federal approval of projects.

“America's most critical infrastructure projects have been tied up and bogged down by an outrageously slow and burdensome federal approval process,” he said. “The builders are not happy. Nobody's happy.”

Environmental groups and Democratic lawmakers countered that the proposed rollback would gut major environmental protections and take away the public's right to know and comment on a project's potential harms.

Key among the changes proposed is one that would newly limit the requirement for federal environmental review to projects that have major federal funding. The change would mean a range of predominantly privately funded and managed projects would not fall under the law's requirement for federal environmental study and for public review and comment.

Other changes including giving federal agencies no more than two years to evaluate any environmental impact of a project.

Mary Neumayr, head of the administration's Council on Environmental Quality, said the changes would not explicitly bar federal consideration of a project's impact on the nation's output of climate-damaging fossil fuel emissions. But environmentalists said a change instructing federal employees to disregard cumulative and longer-term effects would have the same effect, however.

Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter

Top headlines are sent daily

Share this article